ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of the patients' position in obtaining a good quality image of the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa by anesthesiology trainees. METHODS: First and 2nd year residents of our anesthesiology program scanned de right popliteal fossa of a unique subject. The subject laid in 3 different positions (supine, lateral and prone). Before the scanning, residents reviewed a video showing basic ultrasound probe management and images of the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa. Time elapsed upon receiving the ultrasound probe and obtaining a good quality image was measured (at least 70% counter definition and 3 clearly identified structures within the nerve). An evaluator (blinded to the subject position) determined during real time observation the quality of the image. Residents completed a questionnaire regarding the experience lived. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: 26 residents completed the study. There were no statistical differences in the overall time needed by residents to obtain a good quality image in the 3 different positions. Although 96% felt that position influenced the ability to obtain good image. From this experience residents would prefer to do an US guided popliteal block on the prone position.
OBJETIVOS: Evaluar la influencia de la posición del paciente en la obtención de una imagen de calidad del nervio ciático a nivel poplíteo por médicos en formación del programa de anestesiología. METODOLOGÍA: Médicos en formación del programa de Anestesiología examinarán desde la cara posterior la fosa poplítea derecha de un único sujeto en tres posiciones diferentes. Previamente serán expuestos a un video del uso del ecógrafo y de imágenes del nervio ciático a nivel poplíteo. Se consignará el tiempo desde que reciben el transductor hasta obtener imagen del nervio ciático con al menos 70% de definición de contorno y más de 3 estructuras visibles en su interior. Un investigador en tiempo real, ciego a la posición del modelo, decidirá si la imagen cumple los criterios. Finalmente completan una encuesta sobre apreciación subjetiva de la experiencia. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Se evaluaron 26 residentes en total. No hubo deferencias en el tiempo que necesitaron para obtener una imagen de buena calidad del nervio ciático a nivel de la fosa poplítea en las distintas posiciones.
Subject(s)
Humans , Sciatic Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Patient Positioning , Anesthesiology/education , Nerve Block/methods , Posture , Time Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Ultrasonography , Internship and ResidencyABSTRACT
Objective To observe the application of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block (FNB) and popliteal sciatic nerve block(PSNB) in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery.Methods From August 2015 to August 2017,60 patients scheduled for foot and ankle surgery undergoing laryngeal mask airway (LMA) general anesthesia in the People's Hospital of Langfang were randomly divided into 3 groups by the random number table,with 20 cases in each group.Before transfer patients from bed to operating table,A group received dezocine 5 mg iv,B group received FNB combined with PSNB (distal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation),C group received FNB combined with PSNB(proximal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation).A total of 40 mL of 0.375％ ropivacaine were injected guided by ultrasound in B group and C group.The time of sufficient sensory block and awake,the dosage of remifentanil and propofol were recorded.Pain was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) pre-and post block.The incidence of sleepiness,postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV),agitation,pain and adverse reaction were also recorded.Results The time of sufficient sensory block and awake,the dosage of remifentanil and propofol in A,B and C group:A group (not measured),(21.6 ± 1.6) min,(1183 ± 17) μg,(665.0 ± 6.7) mg;B group (25.5 ± 2.5) min,(15.3 ± 1.4) min,(635 ± 16) μg,(455.0 ±6.5)mg;C group (19.6 ±2.3)min,(14.9 ± 1.5)min,(598 ± 14) μg,(438.0±9.9) mg.The time of awake,the dosage of remifentanil and propofol in B group and C group were significantly lower than those in A group (F =44.07,52.41,62.45,all P ＜0.05).The time of sufficient sensory block in C group was lower than that in B group(t =15.69,P ＜ 0.05).The VAS scores at T2,T3 and T4 in A,B and C group:A group (4.5 ± 0.6) point,(8.4 ± 0.5) point,(6.1 ± 0.9) point;B group (2.6 ± 0.5) point,(3.9 ± 0.3) point,(2.4 ± 0.6) point;C group (2.5 ± 0.4) point,(2.3 ± 0.5) point,(1.1 ± 0.5) point.The VAS scores in B group or C group were significantly lower than those in A group (F =52.36,72.82,75.41,all P ＜ 0.05).The VAS scores at T3 and T4 in C group were significantly lower than those in B group (t =18.42,q =14.55,all P ＜ 0.05).The incidence rates of sleepiness,PONV,agitation and incision pain in A,B and C group:A group (25％,25％,15 ％,15 ％,50％);B group(0％,5％,0％,0％,10％);C group (0％,5％,0％,0％,0％).The number of patients who had adverse reactions in B or C group were significantly lower than those in A group (x2 =8.51,8.73,10.11,10.11,9.69,all P ＜0.05).The incidence rate of incision pain at sober in C group was lower than that in B group(x2 =10.89,P ＜0.05).Conclusion The ultrasound-guided FNB and PSNB (proximal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation) can obviously shorten the onset time,reduce the dosage of general anaesthetic.It has effective analgesia during transfer of patients from bed to operating table and sober.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To observe the application of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block(FNB) and popliteal sciatic nerve block(PSNB) in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery.@*Methods@#From August 2015 to August 2017, 60 patients scheduled for foot and ankle surgery undergoing laryngeal mask airway (LMA) general anesthesia in the People′s Hospital of Langfang were randomly divided into 3 groups by the random number table, with 20 cases in each group.Before transfer patients from bed to operating table, A group received dezocine 5 mg iv, B group received FNB combined with PSNB(distal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation), C group received FNB combined with PSNB(proximal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation). A total of 40 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine were injected guided by ultrasound in B group and C group.The time of sufficient sensory block and awake, the dosage of remifentanil and propofol were recorded.Pain was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) pre- and post block.The incidence of sleepiness, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), agitation, pain and adverse reaction were also recorded.@*Results@#The time of sufficient sensory block and awake, the dosage of remifentanil and propofol in A, B and C group: A group(not measured), (21.6±1.6)min, (1183±17)μg, (665.0±6.7)mg; B group (25.5±2.5)min, (15.3±1.4)min, (635±16)μg, (455.0±6.5)mg; C group (19.6±2.3)min, (14.9±1.5)min, (598±14)μg, (438.0±9.9)mg.The time of awake, the dosage of remifentanil and propofol in B group and C group were significantly lower than those in A group (F=44.07, 52.41, 62.45, all P<0.05). The time of sufficient sensory block in C group was lower than that in B group(t=15.69, P<0.05). The VAS scores at T2, T3 and T4 in A, B and C group: A group (4.5±0.6)point, (8.4±0.5)point, (6.1±0.9)point; B group (2.6±0.5)point, (3.9±0.3)point, (2.4±0.6)point; C group (2.5±0.4)point, (2.3±0.5)point, (1.1±0.5)point.The VAS scores in B group or C group were significantly lower than those in A group (F=52.36, 72.82, 75.41, all P<0.05). The VAS scores at T3 and T4 in C group were significantly lower than those in B group (t=18.42, q=14.55, all P<0.05). The incidence rates of sleepiness, PONV, agitation and incision pain in A, B and C group: A group (25%, 25%, 15%, 15%, 50%); B group(0%, 5%, 0%, 0%, 10%); C group(0%, 5%, 0%, 0%, 0%). The number of patients who had adverse reactions in B or C group were significantly lower than those in A group (χ2=8.51, 8.73, 10.11, 10.11, 9.69, all P<0.05). The incidence rate of incision pain at sober in C group was lower than that in B group(χ2=10.89, P<0.05).@*Conclusion@#The ultrasound-guided FNB and PSNB(proximal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation) can obviously shorten the onset time, reduce the dosage of general anaesthetic.It has effective analgesia during transfer of patients from bed to operating table and sober.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Vascular bypass is a surgical procedure widely used to treat peripheral vascular disease. The intraoperative anesthetic technique and the most appropriate postoperative analgesia for these high-risk patients remain controversial. We present the case of a patient undergoing femoropopliteal-distal bypass in our service, presenting with relevant comorbidities to the choice of anesthetic technique. This patient had several determining factors of difficult airway, especially thoracic kyphoscoliosis, which prevented him from being properly positioned for airway management, and chronic lung disease. This patient was also taken antiplatelet drugs, which is a contraindication for neuraxial block. So, we chose the anesthetic technique of peripheral nerve block, specifically the blockade of femoral and sciatic nerves.
Resumo A cirurgia para bypass vascular é um procedimento amplamente usado para o tratamento da insuficiência vascular periférica. A técnica anestésica para o intraoperatório e para analgesia pós-operatória mais apropriada para esses pacientes de alto risco ainda permanece controversa. Apresentaremos o caso de um paciente submetido a bypass femoropoplíteo distal no nosso serviço, que apresentava comorbidades relevantes para a escolha da técnica anestésica. Esse paciente apresentava fatores determinantes de via aérea difícil, principalmente cifoescoliose da coluna torácica, que o impedia de ser posicionado adequadamente para o manejo da via aérea, além de ser portador de patologia pulmonar crônica. Também fazia uso de antiplaquetários que contraindicavam o bloqueio de neuroeixo. Por isso, optou-se como técnica anestésica pelo bloqueio de nervos periféricos, especificamente o bloqueio dos nervos femoral e isquiático.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Popliteal Artery/surgery , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/surgery , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Femoral Artery/surgery , Nerve Block/methods , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methodsABSTRACT
Objective To compare the difference of ultrasound-guided anterior sciatic nerve block by multiple injection and single injection.Methods Among 90 patients undergoing lower limb operation,aged 18-68 years old,47 patients were males and 43 patients were females,all falling into ASA Ⅰ-Ⅲ.The patients were randomized to ultrasound-guided anterior sciatic nerve block by multiple injection (group M,n=45) single injection (group S,n=45).Local anesthetic of 0.5% ropivacaine hydrochloride 20 ml was used.The width,thickness and depth of sciatic nerve and blocking performance time were recorded.Sensory and motor blockade on the operated limb were evaluated every 10 minutes after injection of local anesthetic for 30 minutes and complications were observed in two groups.Results The width,thinkness and depth of sciatic nerve on the ultrasound screen were not statistically significant in the two groups.The performance time of group M was longer than that of group S (P<0.05).The proportion of patients with sensory blockade of each nerve significantly differed between the two groups: for superficial peroneal nerve at 10,20,and 30 minutes,for the sural nerve at 20,30 minutes,for the tibial nerve at 30 minutes,that of group M was higher than that of group S (P<0.05).A significantly greater rate of motor blockade was observed for the dorsal flexion of foot and toes extension in group M than that of group S at 30 minutes (P<0.05).The complications of nausea,vomitting and tinnitus were not different in two groups.Conclusion Multiple injection needs more operation time compared with single injection,but its onset time of sensory and motor blockade is quicker,the complications were not different.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effects of sciatic nerve combined with anesthesia and lumbar spinal combined anesthesia on the vital signs of knee replacement surgery.Methods 112 cases of knee joint replacement surgery with different anesthesia,in The second people's Hospital of Quzhou from August 2013 to August 2015,were selected and randomly divided into experimental group one and experimental group two,56 cases in each group.Experimental group one was treated with sciatic nerve combined with anesthesia,and experimental group two underwent combined spinal-epidural anesthesia,comparison of changes in vital signs,blood pressure and other vital signs after 2 groups.Results After anesthesia,the changes of vital signs such as heart rate and blood pressure of experimental group one was significantly higher than that of experimental group two,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse events in the experimental group one was significantly lower than that in the experimental group two(26.8％),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The MMSE score in the experimental group one(26.44±0.76)was significantly lower than that of the experimental group two(27.18±0.72),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).However,there was no significant difference in MMSE score between the two groups before anesthesia,6 hours,24 hours and 72 hours after operation.Conclusion Patients with knee replacement surgery were treated with sciatic nerve combined with anesthesia after treatment to stabilize the vital signs of patients,and less adverse reactions,more suitable for knee replacement surgery anesthesia treatment.
ABSTRACT
Introducción: La tendencia actual es diferir la cirugía de revascularización de miembros inferiores hasta etapas avanzadas, lo que explica que sean pacientes de mayor complejidad con alta morbimortalidad cardíaca y respiratoria. Los mayores avances para reducirlas, se han desarrollado en la preparación de los pacientes y en las técnicas quirúrgicas. La elección de la técnica anestésica no ha sido considerada un factor determinante. Los bloqueos regionales presentan potenciales ventajas, como mayor estabilidad hemodinámica y respiratoria. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión bibliográfica y presentación de casos clínicos sobre la utilidad de los bloqueos periféricos para anestesia en la cirugía de revascularización de miembros inferiores. Material y métodos: La búsqueda se realizó a través de la base de datos Medline, LILACS y SciELO. Se incluyeron estudios donde los bloqueos periféricos se utilizaron para anestesia. Se describen dos casos clínicos. Resultados: Se seleccionaron 4 artículos originales, 3 de ellos eran estudios descriptivos de la técnica y el cuarto una comparación con anestesia general inhalatoria. 2más correspondieron a casos clínicos. Conclusiones: No existe evidencia suficiente que permita concluir que reducen la mortalidad o la morbilidad cuando se la compara con las demás técnicas anestésicas. Esto puede ser debido al diseño metodológico de los estudios, a la no utilización de la ecografía como guía y la no sistematización de los bloqueos. El análisis de los casos clínicos sugiere que en situaciones específicas como pacientes de alto riesgo cardíaco y respiratorio, bajo tratamiento con anticoagulantes y antiagregantes estos presentan ventajas sobre las otras técnicas.
Background: The current trend is to defer revascularization surgery from lower limbs to advanced stages, which explains why they are more complex patients with high cardiac and respiratory mortality. The choice of anesthetic technique remains controversial. Regional blockades have potential advantages, such as hemodynamic and respiratory stability. Our primary objective was a bibliographic review to assess the peripheral blockages for anesthesia in lower limb revascularization surgery. Our secondary objective was report two clinical cases. Material and methods: The search was performed through the Medline, LILACS and SciELO database. We included studies where peripheral blocks were used for anesthesia. Two clinical cases are described. Results: Four original articles were selected, 3 of which were descriptive studies of the technique and the fourth a comparison with general inhalation anesthesia. 2 more corresponded to clinical cases. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to conclude that peripheral nerve block reduce mortality or morbidity when compared with other anesthetic techniques. This may be due to the methodological design of the studies, to the non-use of echocardiography as a guide and the non-systematization of the blocks. The analysis of the clinical cases suggests that this technique is a good option in specific situations as patients with high cardiac and respiratory risk, under treatment with anticoagulants and antiplatelets drugs.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Sciatic Nerve , Femoral Nerve , Anesthesia, Conduction , Lower Extremity/surgery , Myocardial RevascularizationABSTRACT
Background: This study was planned with an aim to compare duration of analgesia produced by intrathecal bupivacaine and intrathecal buprenorphine with intrathecal bupivacaine and femoral and sciatic nerve blocks. Methods: Patients were randomly divided in two groups, 25 in each and labelled Group – A (Buprenorphine ) and Group – B ( Nerve blocks ) duration of analgesia produced was compared. Results: The mean duration of post operative pain relief in Group A was 5.70 ± 0.90 hours (342.00 Min ± 52 Min). While in Group B it was 11.26 ± 1.20 hours, (675.60 ± 72 min). Conclusion: Nerve blocks (femoral & sciatic) are extremely useful, safe, effective and reliable method for producing post operative pain relief.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided and nerve stimu-lator-guided modified fascia iliaca compartment block combined with popliteal fossa sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing unilateral great saphenous varicose veins surgery.Methods Sixty patients, male 32 and female 28,aged 42-76 years,ASA Ⅰor Ⅱ,scheduled for unilateral great saphenous var-icose veins surgery were randomly divided into two groups (n =30 each):modified fascia iliaca com-partment block with popliteal fossa sciatic nerve block group(group N)and epidural anesthesia(group E).Firstly,popliteal fossa sciatic nerve block was performed in group N.Then confirmed iliac fascia and femoral nerve position on the ultrasonic image and the femoral nerve was blocked.The 1% lido-caine 10 milliliters and 0.5% ropivacaine 10 milliliters were injected in the fascia iliaca compartment block from medial border of sartorius to upward site of femoral artery.Meanwhile,the ultrasonic probe was moving inside in the level of inguinal ligament.The SBP,DBP and HR were recorded be-fore block(T0 ),10(T1 ),30(T2 )and 60 minutes(T3 )after block.The block working time and onset time of sensory block,use of ephedrine after anesthesia,anesthesia efficacy and the postoperative ad-verse reactions in the last 48 hours ,including nausea,vomiting,headache and urinary retention, were also recorded.Results Compared with T0 ,the SBP and DBP was significantly decreased at T2 in group E(P <0.05).Compared with group E at the same time,the SBP and DBP was significantly higher at T2 in group N(P <0.05).The onset time of sensory block was significantly shortened and the use of ephedrine after anesthesia was also less in group N(P <0.05 ).Group E was better than group N in the whole anesthesia efficacy (P <0.05),but there was no significant difference in the ex-cellent rate of anesthesia efficacy between the two groups.The incidence of postoperative urinary re-tention was significantly decreased in group N(P <0.05)and there was no significant difference of the rate of nausea,vomiting and headache.Conclusion Modified fascia iliaca compartment block with popliteal fossa sciatic nerve block has excellent anesthetic quality in patients undergoing unilateral great saphenous varicose veins surgery,which ensures more stable hemodynamics less side effects and more indications when compared with epidural anesthesia.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical application of lumbar plexus combined with sciatic nerve block and spinal anesthesia for elderly patients with knee joint surgery.Methods A total of 77 elderly patients with ASAⅠ ~Ⅲ undergoing single knee re-placement surgery were randomly divided into combined group which recieved lumbar plexus combined with sciatic nerve block and spinal an-esthesia group.The baseline values,blood pressure and heart rate at multiple time points,the block area and duration,the volume of intraoper-ative fluid,and other indexes of adverse reaction were observed.Results The MAP,SBP and DBP in the spinal anesthesia group after the op-eration have changed significantly at the time of T1,T2 and T3.The operating of anesthesia in the combined group was shorter than that of spi-nal anesthesia group.The rate of adverse reactions in combined group was significantly lower than that inspinal anesthesia group.Conclusion The spinal anesthesia can be satisfied for operation requirements,but it will cause the unstable circulation and varied adverse reactions.Lum-bar plexus combined with sciatic nerve block is safe and effective with less adverse reactions,less disturbance of hemodynamics,which is much better for the old or the patients with coagulation abnormalities combined heart and lung disease.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the clinical effect of nerve stimulator combined with low back piexus sciatic nerve block for the arthroscopic surgery anesthesia. Methods 86 patients who required the arthroscopic surgery from March 2010 to March 2013 in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group (43 cases) and control group (43 cases). The observation group accepted nerve stimulator combined with low back plexus sciatic nerve block under the arthroscopic surgery;the control group adopted waist hard joint anesthesia during the arthroscopic surgery. Data of hemodynamics, effects of anesthesia, anesthesias maintaining time, rehydration fluids and adverse effect in both groups were recorded and compared. Results The time for preparation and control of anesthesia operation (Tr), time for feeling completely block (T1), time for recovery (T2), time for completely blocking (T3), time for movement recovery (T4) in observation group were significantly shorter than that of the observation group (P<0.05); the first time of urination (Tu) after operation was significantly longer in control group than that in the observation group (P < 0.05); MAP in the control group were lower than that in the observation group 20 minutes after anesthesia (T20,P < 0.05); complications in the control group were more frequent than that in the observation group. Conclusion The clinical effect of nerve stimulator combined with low back plexus sciatic nerve block for the arthroscopic surgery anesthesia is more obvious , especially for patients with relatively long operating time.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine used to supplement lumbar plexus combined with sciatic nerve block for total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patients.Methods Fifty ASA Ⅱ or Ⅲ patients,aged 80-93 yr,with a body mass index of 17-25 kg/m2,scheduled for unilateral total hip arthroplasty,were randomly divided into 2 groups (n =25 each):normal saline group (group NS) and dexmedetomidine group (group D).Lumbar plexus combined with sciatic nerve block was performed guided by a nerve stimulator in both groups.After a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg was infused over 10 min starting from 20 min after the block,dexmedetomidine was infused at 0.2 μg· kg-1 · h-1 until the end of surgery.While the equal volume of normal saline was given instead of dexmedetomidine in group C.Propofol 20 mg or ketamine 10 mg was infused intravenously when the efficacy of the block was inadequate.The mean arterial pressure (MAP),heart rate (HR),pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2),respiratory rate (RR),side effects during operation,requirement for propofol or ketamine and doctor' s satisfaction were recorded after admission to the operating room,immediately after iv administration,at 0,10 and 30 min after the beginning of surgery,and at the end of surgery (T0-5).Results Compared with the baseline value at T0,MAP and HR were significantly increased at T2-5 in group C (P ＜ 0.05),and no significant change was found in the hemodynamic parameters at each time point in group D (P ＞ 0.05).Compared with group C,the MAP,HR,incidences of respiratory depression and agitation and requirement for propofol or ketamine were significantly decreased,and the doctor's satisfaction was significantly increased (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Dexmedetomidine can increase the efficacy of lumbar plexus combined with sciatic nerve block when used for supplementation of total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patients,the hemodynamics is stable and side effects are fewer.
ABSTRACT
Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) after general or spinal anesthesia may be a method of postoperative pain control, but side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and sedation occurs in most patients. The following research is based on the ultrasound guided femorosciatic nerve block held on parts below the knee joint operation. Because this anesthesia is held locally on the sciatic nerve with continuous anesthesia performed through perineural catheterization, the complications of nausea, vomiting, and sedation may be reduced while postoperative pain caused by the sciatic nerve is controlled. The following report is held on this experience.
Subject(s)
Humans , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled , Anesthesia , Anesthesia, Spinal , Catheterization , Catheters , Knee Joint , Nausea , Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Sciatic Nerve , VomitingABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of dexamethasone on lumbar plexus combined sciatic nerve block (CLPSNB). Methods Sixty patients were randomly allocated into three groups with 20 cases each. Guided by a nerve stimulator,CLPSNB was performed with 0. 5% ropivacaine 45 ml plus dexametbasone 10 mg in group A,0. 5% ropivacaine 45 ml plus normal saline(NS) 2 ml and dexametbasone 10 rng Ⅳ. in group B,or 0. 5% ropivacaine 45 ml plus NS 2 ml in group C. ResultsThe durations of sensory and motor blockade in group A were [(15. 2 ± 3. 3)h and (12. 6 ± 2. 8)h], respectively, which were significantly longer than [(10. 1 ± 2. 1)h and (7. 9 ± 1.6)h]in group B and [(10. 4±2. 5)h and (7. 6±2. 3)hi in group C(P<0. 05). Conclusion Dexarnetbasone added to 0. 5% ropivacaine significantly prolonges CLPSNB.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The efficacy of combined lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks was compared to epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee surgery. Patients and methods: The study included 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I-III patients (age range 18 to 65) undergoing knee surgery. The patients were randomly divided into one of two groups. Epidural anesthesia was performed in the epidural anesthesia (EA) group (n=40), and the lumbar plexus and sciatic nerves were blockedin the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks (LPSB) group (n=40). For each patient, onset of sensory and motor block, degree of motor block, sign of sensory block in the contralateral lower limb for the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group, success in providing adequate anesthesia, hemodynamic changes, time of first analgesic request, and patient and surgeon satisfaction with the anesthetic technique were recorded. Results: One patient in the epidural anesthesia group and three patients in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group required general anesthesia due to failed block. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the success of providing adequate anesthesia. Eight patients in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group developed contralateral spread. The onset of sensory-motor block and the time of the first analgesic request were significantly later in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group than in the epidural anesthesia group. Although there were no significant differences regarding patient satisfaction with the anesthetic technique between the two groups, surgeon satisfaction was significantly higher in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group than in the epidural anesthesia group. Conclusion: The lumbar plexus -sciatic nerve blocks provide effective unilateral anesthesia and may offer a beneficial alternative to epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee surgery.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Anesthesia, Epidural/methods , Knee/surgery , Lumbosacral Plexus , Nerve Block/adverse effects , Sciatic Nerve , Job Satisfaction , Knee/physiopathology , Nerve Block/methods , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
Sciatic nerve block is frequently used for anesthesia or analgesia during lower leg surgery or chronic lower leg pain syndrome. Recently, a lot of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block has been reported because there are several benefits compared to blind technique. We performed ultrasound-guided right sciatic nerve block successfully to the patient who has been suffering from right buttock pain after previous radiation therapy.
Subject(s)
Humans , Analgesia , Anesthesia , Buttocks , Leg , Peripheral Nerves , Sciatic Nerve , Stress, PsychologicalABSTRACT
Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic and systemic disease invloving the axial skeleton. In patient with involved cervical spine of the ankylosing spondylitis, endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscope may be difficult or impossible because they have a limitation of cervical movement and anatomical anomalies. Additionally, ossification of the interspinous ligaments and the formation of bony bridges (syndesmophytes) between vertebrae, resulting in a classic "bamboo spine" appearance make difficult or impossible placement of an epidural or spinal needle. We report a case of a patient with long standing ankylosing spondylitis who underwent revision arthroplasty of the hip using combined continuous psoas compartment block and sciatic nerve block.
Subject(s)
Humans , Arthroplasty , Hip , Intubation, Intratracheal , Laryngoscopes , Ligaments , Needles , Sciatic Nerve , Skeleton , Spine , Spondylitis, AnkylosingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the pain-control effect and overall satisfaction of block of sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa after hallux valgus surgery. METHOD: 33 cases with elective operation for hallux valgus were prospectively investigated. All blocks were performed with the aid of a peripheral nerve stimulator, and 0.5% pucaine was injected in a dose of 1.5 mg/kg when minimal stimulator output still elicited a slight motor response of the foot. In evaluating the analgesics effects of the nerve block, the intensity of pain was assessed by using VAS before, immediately after, and at given time intervals during 36 hours. In the control group, the pain scores were assessed after immediate post-operation and at the given time intervals during 36 hours. The nerve block group rated their level of satisfaction at the first visit of out-patient clinic after discharge. RESULTS: There was significant pain-control effect at least during 24 hours after the nerve block. The patient's satisfaction was high and they had no severe complications. CONCLUSION: Block of sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa provides high satisfaction as the safe effective pain-control method after hallux valgus surgery, so it may be available method for postoperative analgesia after another foot surgery.
Subject(s)
Humans , Analgesia , Analgesics , Foot , Hallux Valgus , Hallux , Nerve Block , Outpatients , Peripheral Nerves , Prospective Studies , Sciatic NerveABSTRACT
0.1), but duration of sensory and motor block in S group was longer than that in C group (P
ABSTRACT
Objective:To observe the efficacy of sciatic nerve block combined with epidural block for treatment of sciatic nerve pain caused by lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.Methods:Patients with lumbar disc herniation(n=59)were divided into two group.Sciatic nerve block combined with epidural block group(group S,n=30)underwent the epidural drugs injection,and sciatic nerve block at the same time according to peripheral nerve stimulatorevoked motor response.The epidural block group(group E,n=29)received the same epidural drugs injection.This two groups were given injection every 7 days and 4 injections for a total treatment.The clinical effect, VAS scores,complication and subjective satisfaction were evaluated.Results:After the treatment,VAS scores of both groups decreased significantly(P